Leake et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Lisa Leake, Kristen Grace, Joseph Heyser, Christopher Stein and Leslie Zepeda |
Raytheon Technologies Corporation |
4:2022cv00436 |
September 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Rosemary Marquez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #10 MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in the Complaint if the Complaint is Not Dismissed in Its Entirety, With Prejudice filed by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Shardonofsky, Esteban) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Shardonofsky, Esteban) |
Filing 12 *RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Lisa Leake. (Knox-Bierman, Nancy) *Modified to correct event type on 12/19/2022 (SCA). |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re: #10 MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in the Complaint if the Complaint is Not Dismissed in Its Entirety, With Prejudice filed by Lisa Leake. (Knox-Bierman, Nancy) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in the Complaint if the Complaint is Not Dismissed in Its Entirety, With Prejudice by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Shardonofsky, Esteban) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -- Leake EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit 2 -- Grace EEOC Charge, #3 Exhibit 3 -- Heyser EEOC Charge, #4 Exhibit 4 -- Stein EEOC Charge, #5 Exhibit 5 -- Zepeda EEOC Charge)(Shardonofsky, Esteban) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Shardonofsky, Esteban) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall have until December 5, 2022 to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 11/3/2022. (ARC) |
Filing 6 *First MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shardonofsky, Esteban) *Modified to correct motion type on 11/3/2022 (ARC). |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Dawn R Solowey, Owen Richard Wolfe on behalf of Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Esteban Shardonofsky on behalf of Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 5 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Lisa Leake: Affidavit of Service re: complaint upon Raytheon Technologies on 10/13/2022. (Knox-Bierman, Nancy) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Lisa Leake. (Knox-Bierman, Nancy) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21135790. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00436-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Nancy Knox-Bierman on behalf of Plaintiffs Kristen Grace, Joseph Heyser, Lisa Leake, Christopher Stein, Leslie Zepeda. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21135790 filed by Christopher Stein, Lisa Leake, Joseph Heyser, Kristen Grace, Leslie Zepeda. (Knox-Bierman, Nancy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.