Kirwin et al v. Kot et al
| Sharmila Kirwin and Levi Kirwin |
| Dariusz Kot, Mildred Jimenez, Daniel Nido, Melissa Fuentes, Kimberly Egbert, Mandy Chamberlain, David Necoechea, Cecilia Rojas-Adnachiel, Aiza Huerta, Pauline Machiche, Visionquest National Limited, Miranda Millage and Sandheep Surendran |
| 4:2022cv00471 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Bruce G Macdonald |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Levi Kirwin, Sharmila Kirwin. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Moore, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21186477. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bruce G Macdonald. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-471-TUC-BGM. Magistrate Election form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21186477 filed by Levi Kirwin, Sharmila Kirwin. (Moore, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
