Succio v. Kohl's Incorporated
James Succio |
Kohl's Incorporated |
4:2022cv00530 |
November 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Raner C Collins |
Personal Injury: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: 4 Notice of Deficiency (Text Only),, #1 Notice of Removal Civil Cover Sheet and Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet by Defendant Kohl's Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Cover Sheet)(Van Assche, Lorena) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Kohl's Incorporated. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet and Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new removal case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file the automated Civil Cover Sheet and Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Kohl's Incorporated. (ARC) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21340396. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Raner C Collins. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-530-TUC-RCC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20224341. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21340396 filed by Kohl's Incorporated. (Van Assche, Lorena) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ARC) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Rule 102a FASTAR Certificate upon Kohl's Incorporated on 10/27/2022. (Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 10/28/2022) (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Succio v. Kohl's Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Succio | |
Represented By: | Leighton H Rockafellow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kohl's Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Andre Harbon Merrett |
Represented By: | Lorena C Van Assche |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.