Hobbs v. M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence H Hobbs
Defendant: M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, William Oppenheimer, Barbara Oppenheimer and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2022cv00540
Filed: December 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Referring Judge: Jacqueline M Rateau
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion re: (24 in 4:22-cv-00290-JCH, 24 in 4:22-cv-00290-JCH) MOTION to Consolidate Cases, (8 in 4:22-cv-00540-RCC-JR) First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Filed filed by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, Barabara Jean Oppenheimer, Barbara Jean Oppenheimer, William Oppenheimer. (Associated Cases: 4:22-cv-00290-JCH, 4:22-cv-00540-RCC-JR) (Waterkotte, Grant)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Lawrence H Hobbs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Associated Cases: CV-22-290-TUC-JCH, CV-22-540-TUC-RCC(JR)) (ARC)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Plaintiff's First MOTION for Extension of Time by Lawrence H Hobbs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(ARC)
January 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 *Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Cesilie J Garles. Reason for return: No Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward. Document number #16 . (REM) *Modified to correct text on 1/25/2023 (REM). Modified on 1/25/2023 (REM).
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Cesilie J Garles. Reason for return: No Such Street - Unable to Forward. Document number 12 . (REM)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: This case, reassigned to the Honorable Raner C. Collins, is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau for all pretrial proceedings and a report and recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and 72.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. All future filings in this case shall be designated:CV-22-00540-TUC-RCC(JR). Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 1/13/2023. (ARC)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SERVICE EXECUTED : Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 11/28/2022 to William Oppenheimer. (ARC)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SERVICE EXECUTED : Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 11/28/2022 to Barabara Oppenheimer. (ARC)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED : Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 11/28/2022 to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation. (ARC)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge Raner C Collins. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-540-TUC-RCC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, William Oppenheimer, Barbara Oppenheimer. (Waterkotte, Grant)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Filed by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, William Oppenheimer, Barbara Oppenheimer. (Waterkotte, Grant)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Grant Daniel Waterkotte on behalf of M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, William Oppenheimer, Barbara Oppenheimer. (Waterkotte, Grant)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Election Form resent and deadline reset (x3). (DLC)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Election Form mailed and deadline reset (x2). (DLC)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (ARC)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 400000538. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jacqueline M Rateau. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-540-TUC-JR. Magistrate Election form attached. (ARC)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Lawrence H Hobbs. (ARC)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 400000538 filed by Lawrence H Hobbs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt, #3 Envelope)(ARC)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, William Oppenheimer, Barbara Oppenheimer. (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hobbs v. M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence H Hobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation
Represented By: Grant Daniel Waterkotte
Represented By: Cesilie Jane Garles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Oppenheimer
Represented By: Grant Daniel Waterkotte
Represented By: Cesilie Jane Garles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Oppenheimer
Represented By: Grant Daniel Waterkotte
Represented By: Cesilie Jane Garles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?