Parks v. Reyes
Plaintiff: Edward F Parks
Defendant: Unknown Reyes, David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and Unknown Day
Case Number: 4:2022cv00544
Filed: December 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Referring Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2023 Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed January 25, 2023, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the First Amended Complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (MYE)
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #6 ) is denied. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 5) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, he must prepay the entire $402.00 filing and administrative fees when he files his action. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #4 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 1/24/23. (MYE)
January 17, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE by Edward F Parks. (3 pages) (MYE)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must file a completed and signed Certificate, using the Certificate form provided with this Order, certifying that Plaintiff's signature on the Certificate shall serve as an original signature on his First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file, within 30 days, a completed and signed Certificate on the form provided with this Order, the Clerk of Court must strike Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a Certificate form. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 1/9/23. (MYE)
December 22, 2022 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Edward F Parks. (2 pages) (MYE)
December 22, 2022 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Unknown Reyes, David Shinn, Mark Brnovich, Unknown Day filed by Edward F Parks. (7 pages)(MYE)
December 22, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Edward F Parks. (2 pages) (MYE)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement (or institutional equivalent). If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Investigation Into Unlawful Actions of Prison Officials (Doc. 1), is dismissed for failure to file on a court-approved form. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner and a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 12/12/22. (MYE)
December 5, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO)
December 5, 2022 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Edward F Parks. (4 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parks v. Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward F Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Shinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Brnovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?