Cattanach v. Maricopa County Community College District et al
Plaintiff: Donna Cattanach
Defendant: Maricopa County Community College District, Deric Hall, Melinda Caraballo and Samantha Crandall
Case Number: 4:2022cv00572
Filed: December 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2023 Filing 9 *MOTION Allow Electronic Filing filed by Donna Cattanach. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Participant Electronic Case Files Registration Form, #2 Proposed Order)(BAC) *Modified to correct event type on 2/22/2023 (BAC).
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have until 3/1/23 to file her response to Defendants' #5 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is directed to the Court's 1/10/23 #6 Order for further details regarding the Motion to Dismiss and her response. Defendants may file a reply on or before 7 days after service of Plaintiff's response. The #5 Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 1/18/23. (BAC)
January 17, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time (Pro Se Document Preparation) by Donna Cattanach. (JAM)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED, Plaintiff must file a response to Defendant's #5 Motion to Dismiss, together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence, no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. Defendants may file a reply on or before 7 days after service of Plaintiff's response. The Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 1/9/23. (BAC)
January 4, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Case , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Maricopa County Community College District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Coleman, Stephen)
December 29, 2022 Filing 3 *ISSUED IN ERROR---NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Maricopa County Community College District. (SCA) *Modified to reflect being issued in error; deadline terminated on 1/24/2023 (SCA).
December 28, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SCA)
December 28, 2022 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21444258. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Raner C Collins. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00572-TUC-RCC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA)
December 28, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20223372. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21444258 filed by Maricopa County Community College District. (Coleman, Stephen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cattanach v. Maricopa County Community College District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donna Cattanach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa County Community College District
Represented By: Stephen Barry Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deric Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melinda Caraballo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samantha Crandall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?