Foley v. Koumal et al
| Matthew V Foley, Jr. |
| Robert Koumal, Scott Lowing, Linda Everett, Chris Nanos, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff's Department Management, Unknown Lopes and Unknown Gibe |
| 4:2022cv00573 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| James A Soto |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING #8 Motion for Transcripts at Government Expense. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 2/15/23. (BAC)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Chris Nanos, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff's Department Management, Unknown Lopes, Unknown Gibe filed by Matthew V Foley, Jr. (9 pages) (BAC) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Transcripts at Government Expense by Matthew V Foley, Jr. (1 page) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BAC) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE: IT IS ORDERED, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos or designee must forward to the Clerk of Court the initial partial filing fee of $10.67. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos or designee must notify the Clerk in writing when Plaintiff is released or transferred to a correctional institution other than the Pima County Jail. Clerk must serve by mail a copy of this Order on Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos, 1750 E Benson Highway, Tucson, Arizona, 85714 and forward a copy of this Order to Financial Administration for the Tucson Division of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Judge James A Soto on 1/24/23. (BAC)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED, Plaintiff's #4 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay $350 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $10.67. The #1 Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. Failure to comply will result in a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice, that states the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 USC 1915(g) and denial of any pending unrelated motions as moot. Clerk must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 1/24/23. (BAC)
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Matthew V Foley, Jr. (1 page) (BAC) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Matthew V Foley, Jr. (2 pages) (BAC) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. Failure to comply will result in a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice, without further notice to Plaintiff and denial of any pending unrelated motions as moot. Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge James A Soto on 1/4/23. (BAC)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (ARC) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Matthew V Foley, Jr. (6 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
