Barnes v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
| Kelvin Darnell Barnes |
| Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Encinas and I Waszkiewicz |
| 4:2023cv00078 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Scott H Rash |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number 400000825. PAID IN FULL. (JAM) |
Filing 3
ORDER Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge Scott H Rash on 3/14/2023. (MCO)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (JAM) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Kelvin Darnell Barnes. (6 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
