Gutierrez v. United States Customs and Border Protection
| Raul Gutierrez |
| United States Customs and Border Protection |
| 4:2023cv00084 |
| February 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Other Statutes: Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to May 17, 2023. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 4/7/23. (JAM)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by United States Customs and Border Protection. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Letzkus, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to United States Customs and Border Protection. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by Raul Gutierrez. (Jacobson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by Raul Gutierrez. (Jacobson, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: THE PARTIES ARE ADVISED that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. In addition, parties shall endeavor not to oppose motions to amend that are filed prior to the Scheduling Conference or within the time set forth in the Rule 16 Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 2/21/2023. (MCO)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States Customs and Border Protection. (JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21614453. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-84-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Raul Gutierrez. (Jacobson, Jeffrey) (JAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATION OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21614453 filed by Raul Gutierrez. (Jacobson, Jeffrey) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gutierrez v. United States Customs and Border Protection | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raul Gutierrez | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Howard Jacobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Suzanne Letzkus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
