Friedman et al v. Pekin Insurance Company et al
Susan Friedman and Kennard Friedman |
Pekin Insurance Company an Illinois corporation doing business as Pekin Insurance, Farmers Automobile Insurance Association and Unknown Parties |
4:2023cv00106 |
March 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Leslie A Bowman |
Rosemary Marquez |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE re: Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand by Kennard Friedman, Susan Friedman re: #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (O'Steen, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Kennard Friedman, Susan Friedman. (O'Steen, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Farmers Automobile Insurance Association, Pekin Insurance Company. (Dominguez, Annelise) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, by Farmers Automobile Insurance Association, Pekin Insurance Company.(Dominguez, Annelise) |
Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation, in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and LRCiv. 72.1 and 72.2. All future filings in this case shall be designated: CV-23-00106-TUC-RM (LAB). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 03/07/2023. (SCA) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge Rosemary Marquez. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-23-00106-TUC-RM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 5 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21657138. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Leslie A Bowman. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-106-TUC-LAB. Magistrate Election form attached.PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (JAM) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Farmers Automobile Insurance Association, Pekin Insurance Company. (Dominguez, Annelise) (JAM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20230368. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21657138 filed by Farmers Automobile Insurance Association, Pekin Insurance Company. (Dominguez, Annelise) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(JAM) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Rule 102(A) Fastar Certificate upon Pekin Insurance Company on 1/31/23. (Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 2/7/23.) SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Rule 102(A) Fastar Certificate upon The Farmers Automobile Insurance Association on 1/31/23. (Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 2/7/23.) (JAM) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.