Jackson v. Unknown Parties
| Eddie A Jackson and Eddie Allen Jackson |
| Unknown Parties |
| 4:2023cv00116 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| James A Soto |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice to the Western District of Michigan advising of receipt of 1:23-cv-00219, case transferred. (BAC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC). |
| Filing 5 Entry filed in error. All docket text associated with this entry has been removed on 3/9/2023 (BAC). Modified on 3/9/2023 (BAC). |
| Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Michigan Western; Case Number 1:23-cv-00219 . Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc) [Transferred from miwd on 3/9/2023.]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of receipt of case (ns) [Transferred from miwd on 3/9/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against Unknown Part(y)(ies) filed by Eddie Allen Jackson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Cover Letter) (ns) [Transferred from miwd on 3/9/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
