Figueroa v. Serenity Luxury Living LLC et al
| Juana Mares Figueroa |
| Serenity Luxury Living LLC, Giselle Auditore, Giselle Vasquez, Unknown Auditore and Unknown Vasquez |
| 4:2023cv00129 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Lynnette C Kimmins |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDERED granting #9 Motion to Substitute Counsel as to Juana Mares Figueroa v. Serenity Luxury Living, LLC, Giselle Auditore, and Giselle Vasquez. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Nicholas J. Enoch and Margot I. Veranes, of LUBIN & ENOCH, P.C., are now the attorney of record for Plaintiff. Shefali Milczarek-Desai, of the Workers Rights Clinic at the University of Arizona College of Law, is terminated as counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins on 4/13/2023. (CKS)
|
| Filing 11 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Substitute Attorney With Client Permission by Juana Mares Figueroa. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Enoch, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Election Form resent and deadline reset (x2). (DLC) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Giselle Auditore, Serenity Luxury Living LLC, Giselle Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 6 *AMENDED DOCUMENT by Juana Mares Figueroa. Amendment to #2 Summons Submitted Serenity Luxury Living Summons (Corrected). (Attachments: #1 Summons Corrected Summons, #2 Summons Corrected Summons)(Milczarek-Desai, Shefali) *Modified to correct event from Amended Document event to Summons Submitted event on 3/16/2023 (MCO). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #2 Summons Submitted filed by Juana Mares Figueroa. UNABLE to issue summons that list multiple defendants on one summons. Only one defendant should be listed on each summons. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Giselle Auditore, Giselle Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21697740. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Lynnette C Kimmins. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-0129-TUC-LCK. Magistrate Election form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Juana Mares Figueroa. (Milczarek-Desai, Shefali) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR STATUTORY VIOLATIONS AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Fair Labor Standards Act 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. Arizona Minimum Wage Act A.R.S. 23-362 et seq.. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21697740 filed by Juana Mares Figueroa. (Milczarek-Desai, Shefali) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
