Foley v. Tucson, City of et al
| Matthew V Foley, Jr. |
| Tucson, City of, Arizona, State of, Tucson Police Department, Arizona Superior Court, Matthew Knight, Pima County Adult Detention Complex, Jason Barton, Unknown Party and Pretrial Services |
| 4:2023cv00139 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| James A Soto |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement (or institutional equivalent). If Plaintiff fails to either pay or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge James A Soto on 5/16/23. (See attached Order for complete details)(JAM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (JAM) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Matthew V Foley, Jr. (11 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
