Barten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Bryan Barten |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 4:2023cv00267 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Maria S Aguilera |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER pursuant to #9 Stipulation: Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company has until and including August, 15, 2023 to file its answer. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 8/4/23. (JAM)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend Time to File Answer by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Freeman, Alicyn) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Alicyn Marie Freeman on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Freeman, Alicyn) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Thomas A Biscup on behalf of Plaintiff Bryan Barten. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge Cindy K Jorgenson. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-23-00267-TUC-CKJ. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 6 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21998023. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Maria S Aguilera. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-267-TUC-MSA. Magistrate Election form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Bryan Barten. (Zebrowski, Paul) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21998023 filed by Bryan Barten. (Zebrowski, Paul) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan Barten | |
| Represented By: | Paul Zebrowski |
| Represented By: | Thomas A Biscup |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Alicyn Marie Freeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
