Carrillo v. Harrison et al
| Patricia V Carrillo |
| Gary Harrison, Louise Bietel and Jason Mayou |
| 4:2023cv00439 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Angela M Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angela M Martinez on 10/6/2023. (MCO)
|
| Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Election Form resent and deadline reset (x2). (DLC) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MYE) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Angela M Martinez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-439-TUC-AMM. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Patricia V Carrillo. (MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Patricia V Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
