Saenz-Martinez v. USA
Petitioner: Jorge Erick Saenz-Martinez and Soplete Unknown
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2023cv00449
Filed: October 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Referring Judge: John C Hinderaker
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2023 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in accordance with the Court's Order filed November 30, 2023, movants motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence is denied and the civil action opened in connection is hereby dismissed. (MCO)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment of dismissal in this civil action (CV 23-00449-TUC-JCH), without prejudice, and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court shall terminate the civil action.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to terminate Document 43 in CR 16-02195-TUC-JCH (EJM). Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 11/29/2023. (MCO)
November 6, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE: Address Subject to Change by Jorge Erick Saenz-Martinez. (2 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MCO)
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Movant's "Post Conviction Motion for Modification of Sentence Pursuant to 2255" (Doc. 1 in CV 23-00449-TUC-JCH) is denied with leave to amend. Movant has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended motion in compliance with this Order. If Movant fails to file an amended motion within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, terminate Document 43 in CR 16-02195-TUC-JCH (EJM) and enter a judgment of dismissal of the civil action opened in connection with this 2255 action (CV 23-00449-TUC-JCH), without prejudice, and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Movant a court-approved form for filing a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody (28 U.S.C. 2255). Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 10/10/2023. (MCO)
October 2, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC)
October 2, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No CR-16-02195-TUC-FRZ-EJM filed by Jorge Erick Saenz-Martinez. (5 pages) (BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saenz-Martinez v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jorge Erick Saenz-Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Soplete Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Christina Vejar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?