Curo Health Services LLC v. Poe
Curo Health Services LLC doing business as Gentiva |
Sarah Lynn Poe |
4:2023cv00450 |
October 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Rosemary Marquez |
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice to the extent it seeks issuance of a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice to Defendant, and is otherwise taken under advisement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief is scheduled for October 12, 2023 at 10:30 a.m., before the Honorable Rosemary Marquez, in Courtroom 5A of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Evo A. DeConcini U.S. Courthouse, 405 W. Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701. Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with the Summons, Verified Complaint (Doc. #1 ), Application for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. #2 ), and a copy of this Order on or before October 9, 2023. Defendant may file a response to the Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief on or before October 11, 2023. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 10/3/2023. (SCA) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Sarah Lynn Poe. (MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 5 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22356692. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-450-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Curo Health Services LLC. (Dowell, Leigh) (MYE) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Curo Health Services LLC. (Dowell, Leigh) (MYE) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Application) and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief by Curo Health Services LLC. (Dowell, Leigh) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(MYE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (TRO Requested). Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22356692 filed by Curo Health Services LLC. (Dowell, Leigh) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Curo Health Services LLC v. Poe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Curo Health Services LLC doing business as Gentiva | |
Represented By: | James Alexander Dattilo |
Represented By: | Leigh Eric Dowell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sarah Lynn Poe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.