Ramion v. SharkNinja LLC
Amy L Ramion |
SharkNinja LLC |
4:2023cv00493 |
November 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Cindy K Jorgenson |
Personal Injury: Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SharkNinja LLC identifying Corporate Parent SharkNinja Global SPV, Ltd., Corporate Parent SharkNinja, Inc., Other Affiliate SharkNinja Midco LLC, Other Affiliate SharkNinja Appliance LLC, Other Affiliate SharkNinja Appliance UK Holdco Limited for SharkNinja LLC. (Williams, Ryan) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by SharkNinja LLC.(Williams, Ryan) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Scott Donald Kaiser, Ryan J Williams on behalf of Defendant SharkNinja LLC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Adam J Kress on behalf of Plaintiff Amy L Ramion. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Out of state attorney Adam J Kress terminated as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by J Steven Sparks on behalf of SharkNinja LLC. (Sparks, J) |
Filing 5 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Amy L Ramion: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on November 13,2023 to SharkNinja Operating LLC . (Traulsen, Richard) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to SharkNinja LLC. (JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22449706. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Cindy K Jorgenson. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-493-TUC-CKJ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Amy L Ramion. (Traulsen, Richard) (JAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22449706 filed by Amy L Ramion. (Traulsen, Richard) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ramion v. SharkNinja LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Amy L Ramion | |
Represented By: | Adam J Kress |
Represented By: | Richard Phillip Traulsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SharkNinja LLC | |
Represented By: | J Steven Sparks |
Represented By: | Ryan J Williams |
Represented By: | Scott Donald Kaiser |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.