Nabi et al v. Blinken
| Sara Nabi and Afzal Khan |
| Antony J Blinken |
| 4:2023cv00494 |
| November 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Antony J Blinken, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22450422. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-494-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Afzal Khan, Sara Nabi. (Khanbabai, Mahsa) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22450422 filed by Sara Nabi, Afzal Khan. (Khanbabai, Mahsa) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Refusal Worksheet)(MYE) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Mahsa Khanbabai on behalf of Plaintiffs Afzal Khan, Sara Nabi. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
