Kiani et al v. Automatic Data Processing Incorporated
Amir Kiani, Amir Monshizadeh and Chelsea Campbell |
Automatic Data Processing Incorporated |
4:2023cv00508 |
November 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Bruce G Macdonald |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Count One: Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty by Amir Kiani. (Veranes, Margot) |
![]() |
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim by Amir Kiani. (Enoch, Nicholas) |
Filing 16 *Counterdefendant Kiani's Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to COUNTERCLAIM by Amir Kiani.(Enoch, Nicholas) *Modified to remove counterclaim event and correct docket text on 1/5/2024 (MYE). |
Filing 15 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Automatic Data Processing Incorporated. (Kroeger, Joseph) |
![]() |
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Automatic Data Processing Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent ADP Atlantic LLC, Corporate Parent Automatic Data Processing Incorporated for Automatic Data Processing Incorporated. (Kroeger, Joseph) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Automatic Data Processing Incorporated by Automatic Data Processing Incorporated.(Kroeger, Joseph) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Automatic Data Processing Incorporated filed by Amir Kiani, Chelsea Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Enoch, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Chelsea Campbell, Amir Kiani . (Enoch, Nicholas) |
Filing 9 Minute Order: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
Filing 8 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, Joint Motion to Extend Defendants Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to The Collective Action Complaint by Automatic Data Processing Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kroeger, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22471409. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bruce G Macdonald. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-508-TUC-BGM. Magistrate Election form attached.PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (MYE) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Automatic Data Processing Incorporated. (Kroeger, Joseph) (MYE) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20234421. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22471409 filed by Automatic Data Processing Incorporated. (Kroeger, Joseph) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Index and Exhibits 1-7)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.