Moore v. KRQ et al
| Justin Steven Moore |
| KRQ, KRQQ, Banner and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2023cv00509 |
| November 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER that the Plaintiff, having established in forma pauperis status in the state court, may proceed here in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #7 ) is GRANTED, with leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint by 1/15/2024. The Clerk of the Court is directed to DISMISS all claims and to close this case, without further notice to Plaintiff, if Plaintiff fails to file the Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions (Docs. #5 , #8 and #9 ) are denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff proceeds with this action, pursuant to his in forma pauperis status, the Court shall order the United States Marshal to serve the Amended Complaint; he shall be required to prepare the service packets for the United States Marshal to effect service. (See attached Order for complete details) Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 12/14/2023. (MCO)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #8 MOTION for Sanctions #7 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Justin Steven Moore. (1 page) (MCO) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Sanctions by KRQ, KRQQ. (Schepler, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Case by KRQ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Schepler, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KRQ. (Healy, Sean) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Sanctions by Justin Steven Moore. (MCO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to KRQ, KRQQ. (ARC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number BAZDC-22473927. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Cindy K Jorgenson. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-509-TUC-CKJ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20234271. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number BAZDC-22473927 filed by KRQQ, KRQ. (Healy, Sean) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(ARC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service by Certified Mail re: Complaint upon KRQQ on 10/10/2023. (Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 10/19/2023)(ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
