Fimbres v. Cohan et al
| Miguel Angel Fimbres |
| Eric S Cohan, Mark Coolidge Johnson and Antony Blinken |
| 4:2023cv00562 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael A Ambri |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Show Cause Hearing scheduled for 3/19/2024 at 10:10 AM is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b). Show Cause Hearing set for 3/19/2024 at 10:10 AM before Senior Judge Raner C Collins as to Miguel Angel Fimbres. (Attachments: #1 Consent)(DLC)
|
| Filing 14 Magistrate Election Form resent and deadline reset (Final Notice). (DLC) |
| Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Miguel Angel Fimbres: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Antony Blinken on 01/05/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Miguel Angel Fimbres: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Eric S. Cohan on 01/05/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Miguel Angel Fimbres: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon US Attorney General, Merrick Garland on 01/08/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Miguel Angel Fimbres: Return of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Mark Coolidge Johnson on 01/05/2023. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Miguel Angel Fimbres: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon US Attorney, Gary M. Restaino on 01/02/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Election Form resent and deadline reset (x2). (DLC) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Joshua L Goldstein on behalf of Plaintiff Miguel Angel Fimbres. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Eric S Cohan, Mark Coolidge Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland. (BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Miguel Angel Fimbres. (Goldman, Maurice) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Miguel Angel Fimbres. (Goldman, Maurice) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Miguel Angel Fimbres. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22581664. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael A Ambri. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-562-TUC-MAA. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22581664 filed by Miguel Angel Fimbres. (Goldman, Maurice) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
