Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
| Alfred Erika Caraffa |
| Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Parties, United States of America, Katie Hobbs, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Joe Biden |
| 4:2023cv00571 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDERED: Plaintiff's pending Motions (Docs. #7 , #8 , #9 , #10 , #12 , and #13 ) are denied. This case must remain closed. The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith because there is no arguable factual or legal basis for an appeal. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 2/7/2024. (ARC)
|
| Filing 15 USCA Case Number re: #14 Notice of Appeal. Case number 24-416, Ninth Circuit. (BAC) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #5 Order, #6 Clerk's Judgment by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(BAC) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (1 page) (ARC) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Compensation for Providing Blood/Plasma Samples by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (4 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF FACTS Under the United States Constitution by Plaintiff Alfred Erika Caraffa. (5 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Combine Civil Actions Into One Class Action by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (6 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 9 MOTION of Error in Case Filing by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (3 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Transfer to the Constitutional Court Under the Fifth Amendment by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (3 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 7 MOTION of New Constitutional Violation by Defendant(s) by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (10 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed January 5, 2024, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (ARC) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED: Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, she must prepay the entire $405.00 filing and administrative fees when she files her action. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Order and because there is no arguable factual or legal basis for an appeal. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 1/5/2024. (ARC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE: FRCiv 5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines. (ARC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to General Order 23-19, which supersedes General Order 14-17. Please see attached Order and Instructions. (Attachments: #1 E-Filing Instructions)(ARC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (ARC) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (12 pages)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
