Aguilar et al v. Gutierrez
| Oscar Contreras Aguilar and Dominic Xavier McDonald |
| M Gutierrez |
| 4:2023cv00574 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Scott H Rash |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed January 23, 2024, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (MYE) |
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is severed into individual actions, one for each named Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court must assign a new case number to each new individual action. The rulings in this Order shall apply in each new case. All further pleadings, motions, or other papers submitted for filing by an individual Plaintiff in his or her separate case must be signed by the individual Plaintiff, or they will be stricken. Within 30 days, each Plaintiff must, in his or her individual case, not in this case, either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $55.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If a Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $55.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in his or her new case within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of his or her action without prejudice and without further notice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ), Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #3 ), Emergency Motion for an Order Directing Defendant to Preserve Certain Surveillance Footage/Videos (Doc. #5 ), and Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. #6 ) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each Plaintiff has 30 days to file a first amended complaint in his or her individual case, not in this case, asserting only his or her own claims for relief. If a Plaintiff fails to file a first amended complaint in his or her individual case within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of that action without prejudice and without further notice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must close this case (CV-23-00574-TUC-SHR) and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Scott H Rash on 1/23/24. (See attached Order for complete details.) (MYE)
|
| Filing 6 Emergency MOTION for a Temporary Restraining Order by Oscar Contreras Aguilar. (6 pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(MYE) |
| Filing 5 Emergency MOTION for an Order Directing Defendant to Preserve Certain Surveillance Footage/Videos by Oscar Contreras Aguilar. (3 pages) (MYE) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA) |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Oscar Contreras Aguilar, Dominic Xavier McDonald. (4 pages) (SCA) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Oscar Contreras Aguilar, Dominic Xavier McDonald. (4 pages) (SCA) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Oscar Contreras Aguilar, Dominic Xavier McDonald. (8 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
