Lamb v. Smith and Wamsley PLLC et al
| Mikkel-Stanley Lamb |
| Smith and Wamsley PLLC, Kaycee Scarr Wamsley, Jason E Smith, Sean K Moynihan and Luisa Hernandez |
| 4:2024cv00024 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Mikkel-Stanley Lamb. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (MCO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (ARC) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Cindy K Jorgenson. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-24-TUC-CKJ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mikkel-Stanley Lamb. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mikkel-Stanley Lamb. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
