Caraffa #350727 et al v. Nerio et al
| Alfred Erik Caraffa and Jeffrey Jeremiah Gabriel |
| Unknown Nerio, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2024cv00027 |
| January 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE re: FRCiv 5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines. (MCO) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE re: This case is subject to General Order 23-19, which supersedes General Order 14-17. Please see attached Order and Instructions. (Attachments: #1 General Order 23-19)(MCO) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 4 MOTION Default Judgment Fed.R.Civ.P.Rule.55(d) by Alfred Erik Caraffa, Jeffrey Jeremiah Gabriel. (4 pages) (MCO) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Alfred Erik Caraffa to Recusal of Federal Judge in a Civil Action by Plaintiff Alfred Erik Caraffa. (4 pages) (MCO) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiffs Alfred Erik Caraffa, Jeffrey Jeremiah Gabriel. (12 pages) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Jeffrey Jeremiah Gabriel, Alfred Erik Caraffa. (13 pages)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
