Cota v. Bacus Foods Corporation et al
| Madeline Cota |
| Bacus Foods Corporation, Brandt Bacus and Jared Bacus |
| 4:2024cv00032 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Maria S Aguilera |
| John C Hinderaker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. #12 ) having been filed, this case is hereby terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Madeline Cota. (Kimble, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Madeline Cota: Proof of Service re: Complaint, Summons, and Motion for Conditional Certification with supporting documents. upon Bacus Foods Corp on 2/07/2024. (Kimble, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Madeline Cota: Proof of Service re: Complaint, Summons, and Motion for Conditional Certification with supporting documents. upon Jared Bacus on 2/07/2024. (Kimble, Andrew) |
Filing 9
ORDER: This case, reassigned to the Honorable John C Hinderaker, is referred to Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera for all pretrial proceedings and a report and recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and 72.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. All future filings in this case shall be designated: CV-24-00032-TUC-JCH(MSA). Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 2/9/24. (BAC)
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge John C Hinderaker. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-24-00032-TUC-JCH. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Certify Class for Conditional Certification of FLSA Collective Action by Madeline Cota. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Madeline Cota, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice, #3 Exhibit 3 - Email Notice, #4 Proposed Order)(Kimble, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Brandt Bacus, Jared Bacus, Bacus Foods Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22663533. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Maria S Aguilera. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-32-TUC-MSA. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Madeline Cota. (Kimble, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22663533 filed by Madeline Cota. (Kimble, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent to Join Form)(MYE) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Andrew Kimble on behalf of Plaintiff Madeline Cota. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
