Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
Alfred Erik Caraffa |
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, United States of America, Michael T Liburdi, Unknown Parties and Ryan Thornell |
4:2024cv00089 |
February 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
Jennifer G Zipps |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 USCA Case Number re: #7 Notice of Appeal. Case number 24-1490, Ninth Circuit. (DXD) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #6 Clerks Judgment by Alfred Erik Caraffa. (68 pages) (KAH) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed March 3, 2024, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (SCA) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE re: FRCiv 5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines. (MYE) |
Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to General Order 23-19, which supersedes General Order 14-17. Please see attached Order and Instructions. (Attachments: #1 Attachment E-Filing Instructions)(MYE) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Alfred Erik Caraffa. (133 pages) (Attachments: #1 Attachment Part 2, #2 Attachment Part 3)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.