Burtman v. Garland et al
Svetlana Burtman |
Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram and Drug Enforcement Administration |
4:2024cv00144 |
March 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Scott H Rash |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 19 NOTICE by Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram re: #18 MOTION for Reconsideration re: #17 Order on Motion for TRO . (Linton, Michael) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Reconsideration re: #17 Order on Motion for TRO by Svetlana Burtman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Richardson, Joel) |
![]() |
Filing 16 Sealed Document: Exhibit F in Support of #10 Defendants' Response to #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F, Exhibits 16-23) (KAH) |
![]() |
Filing 14 MINUTE ENTRY for Motions Hearing held March 26, 2024, before United States District Judge Scott H. Rash. There being no objection by the Plaintiff, the Court GRANTS the Defendants' Motion to Seal Exhibit F in Support of Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #11 ). Further, the Court GRANTS the Defendants' Motion to Quash Subpoena (Doc. #13 ). The parties present argument to the Court regarding the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #2 ) The Court takes the matter UNDER ADVISEMENT and will issue a ruling in the near future. Appearances: Harvey Steinberg, Christopher Boeckx, and Joel Richardson for the Plaintiff: Svetlana Burtman. Michael Linton and Lark Saad for the Defendants: Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram, and Drug Enforcement Administration. Court reporter: Christine Coaly. Hearing held 2:33 p.m. to 3:17 p.m. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGF) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Quash Subpoena by Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Linton, Michael) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Harvey Steinberg on behalf of Plaintiff Svetlana Burtman. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 12 FILED at (Doc. #16 ) SEALED LODGED Proposed Exhibit F re: #11 MOTION to Seal Document Motion to Seal Exhibit F in Support of Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation to Seal is granted. Filed by Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F, Exhibits 16-23)(Linton, Michael) Modified on 3/27/2024 (KAH). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Seal Document Motion to Seal Exhibit F in Support of Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Linton, Michael) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re: #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Linton, Michael) |
![]() |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Svetlana Burtman: Declaration of Service re: Summons in a Civil Action, Complaint, Exhibit 1 to Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction - Attachments, Proposed Order re Motion, Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction, Order Setting TRO Hearing upon DOJ, MERRICK GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL by and through Gary M. Restaino, U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona; ANNE MILGRAM, ADMINISTRATOR; DOJ, DEA by and through Gary M. Restaino, U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona on March 19, 2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Delivery By Private Process Server on Anne Milgram by and through Gary M. Restaino, US Attorney, District of Arizona, served on March 19, 2024 at 2:00 pm)(Kalish Boeckx, James) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Anne Milgram. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Harvey Steinberg, James Christopher Kalish Boeckx, Joel Aaron Richardson on behalf of Plaintiff Svetlana Burtman. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
![]() |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Svetlana Burtman. (Attachments: #1 Summons Anne Milgram, Administrator, DOJ, DEA, c/o U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona)(Kalish Boeckx, James) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22844786. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Scott H Rash. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-144-TUC-SHR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (titled as Motion for Preliminary Injunction) by Svetlana Burtman. (Kalish Boeckx, James) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order)(ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (TRO Requested). Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22844786 filed by Svetlana Burtman. (Kalish Boeckx, James) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.