Scalone v. Instant Brands LLC et al
| Dina Scalone |
| Instant Brands LLC, Instant Brands Incorporated and Corelle Brands LLC |
| 4:2024cv00159 |
| March 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Bruce G Macdonald |
| Personal Injury: Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE re: Notice of Stay by Dina Scalone . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Traulsen, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Corelle Brands LLC, Instant Brands Incorporated, Instant Brands LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22879942. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bruce G Macdonald. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-159-TUC-BGM. Magistrate Election form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Dina Scalone. (Traulsen, Richard) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22879942 filed by Dina Scalone. (Traulsen, Richard) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
