Watson v. USA
Daniel Wayne Watson |
USA |
4:2024cv00185 |
April 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
Rosemary Marquez |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No CR-22-02407-TUC-RM(JR)-1 filed by Daniel Wayne Watson. (10 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Watson v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Daniel Wayne Watson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Patrick Thomas Barry |
Represented By: | Patrick Edward Chapman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.