Toledo et al v. Palafox et al
Emma Ochoa Toledo and Edgar Casahonda |
Andrew Palafox, Francisco Serrano, Nogales, City of and Unknown Parties |
4:2024cv00195 |
April 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
Cindy K Jorgenson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Emma Ochoa Toledo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kelly, Jason) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Edgar Casahonda, Emma Ochoa Toledo. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SCA) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Edgar Casahonda, Emma Ochoa Toledo. (Kelly, Jason) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22930336 filed by Emma Ochoa Toledo, Edgar Casahonda. (Kelly, Jason) (SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.