Ludrick v. Sayso TTT LLC et al
Loriano Ludrick |
Phandolack OV LLC, Phonesanith Phandolack, Pounong Saysouriyosack and Sayso TTT LLC |
4:2024cv00413 |
August 20, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Scott H Rash |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Loriano Ludrick: Acceptance of Service re: Complaint and Summons upon All Defendants on 10/3/24. (Bendau, Clifford) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Phonesanith Phandolack, Phandolack OV LLC, Sayso TTT LLC, Pounong Saysouriyosack. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23377487. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Scott H Rash. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-413-TUC-SHR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Loriano Ludrick. (Bendau, Clifford) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(MCO) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23377487 filed by Loriano Ludrick. (Bendau, Clifford) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.