Rogers v. RTX Corporation
| Thomas James Rogers |
| Raytheon, Raytheon Missile Systems, Raytheon Technologies, RTX Corporation and RTX |
| 4:2024cv00519 |
| October 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Angela M Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: NOTICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M)- IT IS ORDERED that, without further notice, the Clerk of Court shall terminate any defendants in this case who have not been timely served in accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on January 23, 2025. Signed by District Judge Angela M Martinez on 10/24/24. (MYE)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200014076. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Angela M. Martinez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV24-00519-TUC-AMM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number 200014076 filed by Thomas James Rogers.(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
