Homesite Insurance Company v. Hancock et al
| Homesite Insurance Company |
| John Hancock individually and doing business as Metro Intelligence and Michael Johnson |
| 4:2024cv00591 |
| December 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to John Hancock, Michael Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23754446. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00591-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement by Homesite Insurance Company. (Callahan, Charles) (SCA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Homesite Insurance Company. (Callahan, Charles) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23754446 filed by Homesite Insurance Company. (Callahan, Charles) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
