-MLG David Rey Fierro v. Arthur Calderon
| David Rey Fierro |
| Arthur Calderon and Robert L Ayers, Jr |
| Holly D Wilkens and Saor E Stetler |
| 2:1994cv03198 |
| January 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Marc L. Goldman |
| George H. King |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 255 . It is hereby adjudged that the petition for a writ of habeas is denied. corpus is denied. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)
|
|
Filing
199
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman: SCHEDULING FINAL BRIEFING OF CLAIMS: (See document for details.) Petitioner shall have until 5/01/12 to file his opening memorandum of law. Respondent's memorandum of law in oppositio n shall be filed no later than 8/01/12, and Petitioner's reply brief shall be filed no later than 9/01/12. The opening brief and opposition shall be limited to 100 pages. The reply shall be limited to 30 pages. The parties are advised that these dates are firm and no extension of time shall be granted. after receiving the initial two memoranda, the Court will determine whether oral argument is necessary. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
