USA v. AMC Ent Inc, et al
| United States of America |
| AMC Entertainment, Inc, American Multi-Cinema, Inc and Salts, Troutman & Kaneshiro Inc |
| AMC Entertainment, Inc, American Multi-Cinema, Inc and Salts, Troutman & Kaneshiro Inc |
| AMC Entertainment, Inc, American Multi-Cinema Inc and United States of America |
| Tasia Marie Scolinos and Dov Lutzker |
| 2:1999cv01034 |
| November 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| S. James Otero |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
544
CONSENT ORDER ON LINE OF SIGHT REMEDIES re enforcement of provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act as to American Multi-Cinema, Inc. and AMC Entertainment (see document for specifics as to instructions, requirements etc). AMC shall provide m onetary compensation to DOJ Complainants in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00. The United States shall have sole discretion to determine the individual DOJ Complainants and their respective monetary compensation. Within 30 days of the Effective Date, defendants AMC Entertainment Inc. and American Multi-Cinema, Inc. shall each make a payment in the amount of $12,500.00 to the United States by Judge S. James Otero Related to: Stipulation 542 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
