Kingvision Pay-Per v. Janice Ellen Roebuck, et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Kingvision Pay-Per v. Janice Ellen Roebuck, et al

Kingvision Pay-Per v. Janice Ellen Roebuck, et al

Case Number:	2:1999cv02672
Filed:	June 2, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 2, 2020	Filing 32 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK, in favor of Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd against Defendant, Janice Ellen Roebuck, John Stewart aka Jack Stewart and Judith Ann Stewart, individually and dba Murphys Caf aka Murphys, entered on June 18, 2010 in the amount s as set forth: Renewal of money judgment: a. Total judgment $8,500.00. b. Costs after judgment $00.00. c. Subtotal (add a and b) $8,500.00. d. Credits $0.00. e. Subtotal (subtract d from c) $8,500.00. f. Interest after judgment(.30%) $254.02. g. Fee for filing renewal of application $0.00. h. Total renewed judgment (add e, f and g) $ 8,754.02. Related to: Second APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment, 31 . (shb)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 2, 2020

Filing 32 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK, in favor of Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd against Defendant, Janice Ellen Roebuck, John Stewart aka Jack Stewart and Judith Ann Stewart, individually and dba Murphys Caf aka Murphys, entered on June 18, 2010 in the amount s as set forth: Renewal of money judgment: a. Total judgment $8,500.00. b. Costs after judgment $00.00. c. Subtotal (add a and b) $8,500.00. d. Credits $0.00. e. Subtotal (subtract d from c) $8,500.00. f. Interest after judgment(.30%) $254.02. g. Fee for filing renewal of application $0.00. h. Total renewed judgment (add e, f and g) $ 8,754.02. Related to: Second APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment, 31 . (shb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kingvision Pay-Per v. Janice Ellen Roebuck, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?