Top Rank Inc v. Robert Lopez, et al
| Top Rank Inc |
| Does and Robert Lopez |
| Creative Recovery Concepts Inc |
| Manuel L Real, Christina A Snyder and Ralph Zarefsky |
| 2:2000cv09155 |
| September 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| Harry L. Hupp |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
RENEWAL OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY CLERK: The default judgment entered on October 7, 2002 on behalf of Plaintiff, TOP RANK, INC. which was then assigned by Plaintiff to Assignee of Judgment, CREATIVE RECOVERY CONCEPTS, INC. and renewed on September 25, 2012 in favor of Assignee of Judgment, CREATIVE RECOVERY CONCEPTS, INC. and against defendants ROBERT LOPEZ individually and dba BOB'S SPORTSMAN HIDEOUT aka BOB'S COCKTAILS, jointly and severally, is hereby renewed in the following amount s: Renewal of money judgment: a. Total Judgment as last renewed - $9,979.11.; b. Costs after Judgment - $0.00.; c. Attorney Fees - $0.00.; d. Subtotal (add a and b) -$9,979.11.; e. Credits after judgment - $0.00.; f. Subtotal (subtract e from d) - $0.00.; g. Interest after judgment - $2,404.55.; h. Fee for filing renewal - $0.00.; i. TOTAL RENEWED JUDGMENT - $12,383.66. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment, 40 . (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
