Hai Chen Sun, et al v. Boeing Company
| Hai Chen Sun, Chien Chen, Jung Chen, Mei Hsing Huang, Eileen Huang, Li Ling Huang, Chien Huei Hung, Shang Fu Su, Pin Chia Su, Lily Hsing, Wei Hsuan Lai, Wei Chen Lai, Tsai Yen Tung, Iris Tai, Johnson Tai, Chin Lien Lee, Ming Sheng Wang, Jiow-Yuh Pai, Chung-Jui Pai, Chung-Jiun Bai, Chung-Fen Pai, Ling-Shaur Pai, Joe Pai, A-Mei Yen-Wang, Yi-Ping Yen, Yi-Ho Yen, Jou Hsiang Chen, Kenneth Chen, Terry Chen, Anna Chen, Pauline Chen, Allen Chen, Christina Chen, Evan Chen and Isaac Chen |
| Boeing Company |
| 2:2001cv09290 |
| October 29, 2001 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rosalyn M Chapman |
| Gary A Feess |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 53
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court Orders that the 13 non-Article 28 cases be DISMISSED. This ruling MOOTS Boeing's pending motion seeking certification of the court's prior denial of its motion to dismiss by Judge Gary A. Feess,, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(bp, )
|
| Filing 52 STATUS REPORT by defendants Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation regarding forum non conveniens issues; declaration of Ronald A. McIntire in support thereof. (pbap) |
| Filing 51 STIPULATION filed for dismissal of claims of plaintiffs Jou Hsiang Chen, Kenneth Chen, Terry Chen, Anna Chen, Pauline Chen, Allen Chen, Christina Chen, Evan Chen, Isaac Chen and Eileen Huang against the Boeing Company with prejudice as to all claims with each party to bear its own costs. (gk) |
| Filing 50 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by plaintiffs Hai Chen Sun, et al. to motion to reconsider of defendants The Boeing Co. and Goodrich Corporation [40-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 49 RESPONSE by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation to the Court's 6/25/03, minute order request for additional briefing [46-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 48 MINUTES by Judge Gary A. Feess: Court seeks further clarification before making its final decision on defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation's motion for reconsideration [40-1]. Court seeks further briefing from the parties on the limited issues discussed in this minute order. The briefing, which is limited to a 10 page memorandum of points and authorities, is to be submitted by all parties simultaneously on or before 7/11/03. No further briefing is to be submitted thereafter except on Order of the Court. As a result of this delay in the Court's ruling on the motion to reconsider, the Court cannot address the request for certification [34-1], which would be mooted if the Court were to reverse itself on the forum non conveniens issue. Accordingly, hearing on that motion, now set for 6/30/03, is VACATED. CR: none present. (gk) |
| Filing 47 MINUTES (In Chambers) by Judge Gary A. Feess: vacating 6/30/03 hearing re motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) [34-1] CR: None Present (dw) |
|
Filing 46
MINUTES: Proceedings: ( In Chambers) vacating the 6/30/03 hearing re motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) [for order certifying for immediate appeal re the Court's 3/27/03 order denying Boeing's and Goodrich's motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds] [34-1]. A written order resolving the motion will follow by Judge Gary A. Feess CR: none (pbap)
|
| Filing 45 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) before Judge Gary A. Feess: The Court VACATES motion for reconsideration [40-1] the hearing currently schedule for June 16, 2003. A hearing on this motion, if any, will occur at the same time as the status conference scheduled for 06/19/03 @ 10:30 a.m. CR: None Present (jp) |
| Filing 44 REPLY by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of motion for reconsideration of order denying motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds [40-1]; supplemental declaration of Chung H. Han in support thereof. (gk) |
| Filing 43 OPPOSITION by plaintiffs Hai Chen Sun, et al. to the motion of defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporaiton for reconsideration of order denying motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds [40-1]; declaration of Juanita M. Madole in support thereof. (gk) |
| Filing 42 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FACSIMILE AND MAIL by defendants The Boeing Company on 5/23/03 of notice of motion and motion of defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation for reconsideration of the Court's Order denying motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds; memorandu of points and authorities in support thereof; declaration of Chung H. Han in support of defendants The Boeing Company's and Goodrich Corporation's motion for reconsideration of order denying motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds; and proof of service. (gk) |
| Filing 41 DECLARATION of Chung H. Han by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of motion for reconsideration of order denying motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds [40-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 40 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation for reconsideration of order denying motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds ; motion hearing set for 9:30 6/16/03; memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof. (gk) |
|
Filing 38
STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Gary A. Feess that The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation's motion for reconsideration shall be filed on 5/23/03, for hearing on 6/16/03; and resetting hearing on The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation's motion for certification [34-1] 9:30 6/30/03. (gk)
|
| Filing 39 REPLY by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) [34-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 37 OPPOSITION by certain plaintiffs Hai Chen Sun, et al. to defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation's motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) [34-1]; memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof. Lodged Proposed Order. (gk) Modified on 05/08/2003 |
| Filing 36 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FACSIMILE AND MAIL by defendant The Boeing Company on 4/28/03 of notice of motion and motion of defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b); memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof; declaration of Chung H. Han in support of defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation's motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b); and proof of service by facsimile and mail. (gk) |
| Filing 35 DECLARATION of Chung H. Han by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) [34-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) [for order certifying for immediate appeal re the Court's 3/27/03 order denying Boeing's and Goodrich's motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds] ; motion hearing set for 9:30 5/19/03; memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof. (gk) |
| Filing 33 MINUTES by Judge Gary A. Feess: Court approves the WITHDRAWAL by defendant The Boeing Company of its motion to dismiss certain plaintiffs on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. CR: none present. (gk) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE OF ERRATA by defendant The Boeing Company re proof of service by mail filed on 3/17/03. (gk) |
| Filing 31 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Chung H. Han by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 30 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Francis Xavier by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of re motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 29 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Herbert Han-Pao Ma by defendant The Boeing Company in support of defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation's motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) Modified on 03/19/2003 |
| Filing 28 REPLY by defendant The Boeing Company in support of motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1] to opposition of Taiwanese plaintiffs. (gk) |
| Filing 27 REPLY by defendant The Boeing Company in support of motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1] to opposition of Taiwanese plaintiffs. (gk) |
| Filing 26 DECLARATION of Jaw-Perng Wang by plaintiffs Hai Chen Sun, et al. in opposition to motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 25 DECLARATION of Charles M. Finkel by plaintiffs Hai Chen Sun, et al. in opposition to motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 24 OPPOSITION by plaintiffs Hai Chen Sun, et al. to motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant The Boeing Company on 2/10/03 of notice of motion and motion of defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens; memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof. (gk) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation on 2/10/03 of notice of motion and motion to dismiss on the gournds of forum non conveniens; memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof; and declarations in support. (gk) |
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of George Yribarren by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of the motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of Francis Xavier by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of the motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 19 DECLARATION of Martin F. Sheehan by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of the motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION of Herbert Han-Pao Ma by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of the motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Simon Lie by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of the motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Greg T. Hill by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation in support of the motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Chung H. Han by defendants The Boeing Company and defendant Goodrich Corporation in support of the motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens [14-1]. (gk) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendants The Boeing Company and Goodrich Corporation to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens ; motion hearing set for 9:30 3/3/03; memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof. (gk) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT by defendant The Boeing Company to defendant Singapore Airlines, Ltd.'s motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens. (gk) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF CONSENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by defendant The Boeing Company in support of defendant Singapore Airlines, Ltd.'s motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens; declarations of Simon Lie and Chung Han in support thereof. (gk) |
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE DFT SINGAPORE AIRLINES, LTD.'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA DAMAGES LAW by Judge Gary A. Feess: The Crt finds that the Warsaw Convention preempts Proposition 51 &, thus, DEN Singapore Airlines, Ltd.'s motion to apply Proposition 51 comparative fault in the trial of the claims brought by California plfs [9-1]. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 REPLY by dft Singapore Airlines, Ltd. to plfs' opp to motion for clarification of applicable California damage law [9-1]; supplemental decl of Stephen R. Ginger. (gk) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Singapore Airlines, defendant Singapore Airlines clarification of applicable California damage law ; motion hearing set for 9:30 1/6/03 (pbap) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER filed by defendant Boeing Company to complaint [1-1]; (Related to MDL 01-1394 GAF (RCx) (dw) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Boeing Company (Related to MDL 01 1394 GAF (RCx) (dw) Modified on 01/16/2002 |
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Gary A. Feess extending time to respond by answer, motion or otherwise to the complaint [1-1] to & including 1/15/02 as to dft The Boeing Company . (gk)
|
| Filing 5 MIN bef Judge Gary A. Feess: The above-entitled actn has been assigned to Judge Feess as a rel case to John Diaz v. Singapore Airlines, Ltd., CV 00-11879 GAF (RCx) consol under Multidistrict Litigation Case No. MDL 1394 (see doc for fur detail). CR: N/P (Send) (jp) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE PURSUANT To Section 5.6 of General Order 224 by Judge Lourdes G. Baird , Chair of the Related Case Assignment Committee. Reassigning all related cases of defendant Boeing Company to Judge Gary A. Feess to hear all proceedings through pretrial or for as long as the Judge deems appropriate. Any disc matters will be referred . The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge [ CV 01-9290 GAF (RCx)] [ Related Group Ctrl No.: CV 00-11879 GAF (RCx)] (cc: all counsel) (rn)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by plaintiff of related case(s) MDL 1394 (rn) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiffs (jag) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Summons(es) issued referred to Discovery Rosalyn M. Chapman (jag) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
