Michael V Ragsdale, et al v. Universal Studios
| Michael V Ragsdale and Timothy S Mahoney |
| Universal Studios Inc |
| 2:2002cv01767 |
| February 28, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A Howard Matz |
| Ralph Zarefsky |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2002. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.)(Closing) (ir) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST OF DISMISSAL OF action w/out prej by plaintiffs Michael V Ragsdale, Timothy S Mahoney pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) (MD JS-6) (ir) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION filed to extend time to answer complaint [1-1] until 5/23/02 as to defendant (ir) |
| REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING Patent or Trademark (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.)(Opening) (nhac) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements filed (ir) |
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER following filing of cmp (See doc for fur details) by Judge A. H. Matz (ir)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AS TO INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiffs Michael V Ragsdale, Timothy S Mahoney (jp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Summons(es) issued referred to Discovery Ralph Zarefsky; jury demand (jp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
