USA v. 12910 13Th St Chino
United States of America |
12910 13Th Street, Chino, California |
Frank Acosta, Community Commerce Bank, Kelli Davis Humphreys and Kelli Peterson |
2:2002cv01798 |
November 12, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Christina A. Snyder |
Carolyn Turchin |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Civil Forfeiture |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 ORDER DENYING CLAIMANT'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b)(3) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court concludes that claimant is not entitled to relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) because claimant has failed to meet his burden. The Court hereby DENIES claimant Frank P. Acosta's motion to vacate the Court's 11/12/2009 order 100 . (gk) |
Filing 99 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 98 , this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice so that the defendant property can be sold and the net proceeds of sale distributed to outstanding criminal restitution orders against claimants Acosta and Peterson. Each of the parties shall bear its own costs and attorney fees associated with this civil forfeiture action. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.