Manuel Ramirez, et al v. Christine Poulos, et al Featured Case

US immigration law permits H-1B foreign workers to be in the United States for no more than six years. The issue in this case was whether time spent outside of the United States by the plaintiff during the six years count in the calculation of the six-year limit.

Plaintiff: Manuel Ramirez and Gabriella Salas
Defendant: Christine Poulos and James Ziglar
Case Number: 2:2002cv02811
Filed: April 4, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Orange
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Edward Rafeedie granting motion for attorney fees and expenses purs to 28 USC Sec 2412 [23-1] (yc)
November 13, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 24
STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Edward Rafeedie continued hearing on motion for attorney fees and expenses purs to 28 USC Sec 2412 [23-1] 10:00 12/16/02 (yc)
October 7, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 22
ORDER by Judge Edward Rafeedie granting motion for summary judgment [14-1]. Dfts are hereby Ord to authorize plfs' stay in H status nunc pro tunc from 1/2/02, through 10/30/02. Dfts are hereby enjoined from applying INA sec 212(a)(9)(B) to plfs. Terminating case (MD JS-6) (ENT 10/8/02), mld ntcs. (twdb)
July 10, 2002 Filing 12
NOTICE OF INTENT TO SCHEDULE THE CASE by Judge Edward Rafeedie; the ptys are Ord to file a rpt & otherwise comply w/ FRCP 26(f) by filing w/ the Crt all necessary papers & docs; no ext for the filing of the rpt will be gr (rrey)
June 28, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 11
STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Edward Rafeedie that the time for dfts to ans, etc to the cmp shld be ext to 6/28/02. (yc)
April 10, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 3
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Edward Rafeedie ordering Mot to amd. submitted received on 4/8/02 is not to be fld but instead rejected; Denial based on: FRCP 5(d) No proof of service (yc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manuel Ramirez, et al v. Christine Poulos, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manuel Ramirez
Represented By: Blanche Elizabeth Maine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gabriella Salas
Represented By: Blanche Elizabeth Maine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine Poulos
Represented By: David E Pinchas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Ziglar
Represented By: David E Pinchas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?