Eric J Lindsey v. SLT Los Angeles LLC, et al
| Ruby Roberson, Beverly Nelson, Martitia McNeel, Eric J Lindsey, Luanna Lawrence, Pat Johnson, Charmaine Hiruko, Joyce Ferguson and Carolyn Williams |
| Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc, SLT Los Angeles LLC, John Does, Western Host Inc and Westin Los Angeles Airport |
| 2:2002cv03822 |
| September 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Gary A. Feess |
| fernando m. olguin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
351
REVISED JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess. it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: Judgment in favor of Starwood and against Panache on Panache's claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. 1981; Judgment in favor of Starwood and against Panac he on Panache's claim for relief under the California Unruh Act, California Civil Code 51; Judgment in favor of Panache and against Starwood on Panache's claim for breach of contract; Damages are awarded to Panache in the sum of $21,07 0.70 on the claim for breach of contract for out-of-pocket costs; No damages are awarded to Panache on the claim of breach of contract for lost profits or lass of business goodwill; and No prejudgment interest is awarded to Panache on out-of-pocket costs or costs of suit. Plaintiff is awarded costs of suit. (bp)
|
|
Filing
329
JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess: The case having been tried to a jury on the claims of E-JAY'S PANACHE IMAGES ("PANACHE"), a partnership, against STARWOOD HOTELS and RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., ("STARWOOD") and special verdicts having been rendered on the liability and damages phases of the trial, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Judgment in favor of STARWOOD and against PANACHE on PANACH E'S claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; 2. Judgment in favor of STARWOOD and against PANACHE on PANACHE'S claim for relief under the California Unruh Act, California Civil Code § 51; 3. Judgment in favor of PANACHE and again st STARWOOD on PANACHE'S claim for breach of contract. 4. Damages are awarded to PANACHE in the sum of $65,070.70 on the claim of breach of contract. 5. PANACHE is further awarded costs of suit incurred herein in an amount to be determined. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
300
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Order Clarifying Pre-Trial Conference Order: The Court noted over the weekend that its pre-trial conference order contains an unintended ambiguity. The Court set time limits of 9 hours of witness exa mination for each side but without providing an allocation of those hours between the phases of the trial. Accordingly, the parties are advised that the Court is allotting 6 hours each for witness examination during the liability phase, and three hours each for the damages phase. (smo)
|
|
Filing
299
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Attached is a copy of a draft verdict form to be used in trial of this lawsuit. The parties should review this document and the draft jury instruction previously provided and be prepared to discuss them at the hearing now set for Monday, September 30, 2013, at 3:30 p.m. (smo)
|
|
Filing
290
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: ORDER RE:JURY INSTRUCTIONSThe Court has now read and considered the parties agreed on instructions and their separate proposed instructions to which they do not agree. From those materials the Court has prepared a draft set of jury instructions which will be the basis for all further discussion regarding the instructions to be used at trial. A copy of the draft instructions is attached. The Court will confer with counsel during the trial for the purpose of developing a final set of instructions to be given to the jury at the close of the case. (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
