Nathan McKinney v. Ernest Roe
| Nathan McKinney |
| A P Kane and Ernest Roe |
| 2:2002cv04493 |
| September 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 173 . (sbou)
|
|
Filing
128
JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 127 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
