Sergio Ochoa v. Jeanne Woodford
| Sergio Ochoa |
| Jeanne Woodford and Vincent Cullen |
| Randall Schnack, Clerk Cathy Catterson, Chief Deputy Ops, Death Penalty H/C Law Clerks, Federal Public Defender, Maria E Stratton, Dean Richard Gits, Keith H Borjon, Scott T Johnson, Vay I Williams and Statia Peakheart |
| 2:2002cv07774 |
| April 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
PROTECTIVE ORDER re 77 , 81 , 82 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. This Court enters the following Protective Order regarding (1) documents and materials from trial counsel's files that Petitioner provides to Respondent during this habeas action; (2 ) any related testimony provided at a deposition or an evidentiary hearing in this matter; and (3) any reference to such documents or testimony in the parties' pleadings submitted to the Court. (See attached document for details.) The Court now addresses the scheduling of the deposition. Petitioner may schedule the deposition of trial counsel for any date that is at least three weeks after Petitioner provides Respondent with trial counsel's files. (lom) (emailed 4/13/11)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
