Stan Lee Media Inc, et al v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, et al
Plaintiff: Stan Lee Media Inc
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Jonathan Gordon, Karen Smith, Stephen Gordon, -, Peter F Paul and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2003cv01036
Filed: February 12, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary A Feess
Referring Judge: James W McMahon
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2003. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2003 Filing 23 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF CASE by plaintiffs' Stan Lee Media Inc, and Stan Lee Media Inc pursuant to FRCP 41a(1). This action and all the claims asserted by the plaintiffs herein are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each side bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees (MD JS-6) (bp)
July 29, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Gary A. Feess, granting Merill and Smith's motion to dismiss and dismisses SLM's claims against them with prejudice [11-1] (bp)
July 2, 2003 Filing 21 RECEIPT OF TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 06/23/03. CR: L. Gonzalez. (cbr)
July 2, 2003 TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 06/23/03. (cbr)
June 23, 2003 Filing 20 MINUTES: The court takes the motion to dismiss [11-1] under submission by Judge Gary A. Feess CR: Lisa Gonzalez (bp)
June 13, 2003 Filing 19 REPLY MEMORANDUM by defendant Merrill Lynch Pierce, defendant Karen Smith in support of motion to dismiss [11-1] (shb)
June 13, 2003 Filing 18 OPPOSITION filed by defendant Merrill Lynch Pierce, defendant Karen Smith to request judicial notice [15-1] (shb)
June 5, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Gary A. Feess, continuing the hearing on motion to dismiss [11-1] 9:30 6/23/03. Defendants shall serve and file their reply papers by Friday, June 6. (bp)
May 23, 2003 Filing 16 OPPOSITION by plaintiff Stan Lee Media Inc, plaintiff Stan Lee Media Inc to motion to dismiss. [11-1] (sv)
May 23, 2003 Filing 15 REQUEST by plaintiff Stan Lee Media Inc, plaintiff Stan Lee Media Inc for Judicial Notice re motion to dismiss. [11-1] (sv)
May 2, 2003 Filing 14 APPENDIX OF UNPUBLISHED AUTHORITIES by defendants Merrill Lynch Pierce, Karen Smith in support of motion to dismiss [11-1] (jp)
May 2, 2003 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by defendants Merrill Lynch Pierce, Karen Smith in support of motion to dismiss [11-1] (jp)
May 2, 2003 Filing 12 REQUEST by defendants Merrill Lynch Pierce, Karen Smith for Judicial Notice in support of motion to dismiss [11-1] (jp)
May 2, 2003 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendants Merrill Lynch Pierce, Karen Smith to dismiss Pursuant to Rule 9(b) and FRCP 12(b)(6); motion hearing set for 9:30 6/16/03; Lodged Proposed Order (jp)
April 14, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Gary A. Feess extending time to answer complaint [1-1] to 5/2/03 as to defendants' Merrill Lynch Pierce, and Karen Smith . Plaintiff's papers, if any, in opposition to such motions shall be filed and served on or before May 23, 2003. (bp)
April 4, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 (Related Case) filed. [ Related Case no.: CV 01-1621 GAF (Mcx)] Case transferred from Judge Dickran Tevrizian to Judge Gary A. Feess for all further proceedings. Case referred from Discovery Fernando M. Olguin to Discovery James W. McMahon The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge [ CV 03-1036 GAF (Mcx)] (cc: all counsel) (kc)
March 28, 2003 Filing 8 COUNTER-STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION filed by plaintiffs Stan Lee Media Inc, Stan Lee Media Inc to defendant Merrill Lynch's notice of related case [7-1] (jp)
March 26, 2003 Filing 7 NOTICE by defendant of related case(s) CV 01-1621 GAF (Mcx) (rn)
March 26, 2003 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT of defendant Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc (jp)
March 26, 2003 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Merrill Lynch Pierce on 3/26/03 of Notice of related case; Disclosure statement (see document for further details). (jp)
February 21, 2003 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporation, a Delaware corporation; Service by Under CCP 416.10 on 2/14/03 via Personal service by serving Summons and Complaint to Margret Wilson, Agent for service of process for Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith INcorporated, a Delaware corporation. (jp)
February 14, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER With Regard to Newly Assigned Cases by Judge Dickran Tevrizian; Read this order carefully; It controls this case (nhac)
February 12, 2003 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION & NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiffs (jag)
February 12, 2003 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Summons(es) issued referred to Discovery Fernando M. Olguin (jag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stan Lee Media Inc, et al v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stan Lee Media Inc
Represented By: Alan S Gutman
Represented By: Elizabeth Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Represented By: Daniel L. Germain
Represented By: Kevin S Allred
Represented By: Manuel F. Cachan
Represented By: Marc TG Dworsky
Represented By: Robert L Dell Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Smith
Represented By: Daniel L. Germain
Represented By: Kevin S Allred
Represented By: Manuel F. Cachan
Represented By: Marc TG Dworsky
Represented By: Robert L Dell Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Gordon, -
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter F Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?