Jamal A Shakir v. Edward S Alameida, et al
Jamal Asim Shakir |
Edward S Alameida, -, Bart Belknap and Bill Lockyer, - |
2:2003cv08732 |
January 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
David O. Carter |
Margaret A. Nagle |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 MODIFIED JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. It Is Ordered that the Petition is GRANTED on Ground One, and DISMISSED on Grounds Two, Three and Four. (see order for further information). Related to: Judgment, 71 (twdb) |
Filing 71 JUDGMENT in a Civil Case by Judge David O. Carter. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition is GRANTED on Ground One, and DISMISSED on Grounds Two, Three, and Four. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall release Petitioner from custody unless, within 90 days from the entry of judgment, retrial proceedings are initiated in state court. (db) |
Filing 61 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, GRANTING PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS; SETTINGHEARING DATE: (See document for details.) Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS the Petition and ORDERS the Government to produce Shakir at a hearing on November 17, 2008 at 8:30 a.m., to determine the best means of assuring his release or receiving a new trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.