Perfect 10 Inc v. Theodore M Hasse et al
Perfect 10 Inc |
Theodore M Hasse and Does |
2:2004cv02585 |
April 13, 2004 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
S James Otero |
Ralph Zarefsky |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
11
NOTICE of DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. as to Theodore M Hasse Dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the FRCP. MD JS-6 (pj, )
|
Filing
10
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than 10/12/2004 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider: Plaintiffs filing of a motion for entry of default judgment by Judge S. James Otero: Court Reporter: Not Present. (pj, )
|
Filing
9
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Plaintiff is directed to take steps to close this action by requesting the clerk to enter judgment or by applying to the Court for entry of judgment if government by FRCP 55(b)(2). Such request or application shall be filed no later than 9/23/04 by Judge S. James Otero :Court Reporter: None Present. (pj, )
|
Filing
8
DEFAULT BY CLERK ENTERED as to Defendant Theodore M Hasse (pj, )
|
Filing
6
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than August 19, 2004 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider: Answer by the defendant or plaintiffs request for default by Judge S. James Otero Court Reporter: Not Present (pj, )
|
Filing
4
MINUTES: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than 15 days from date of order why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution The Court will consider: Proof of service of summons and complain. Answer by the defendant or Plaintiff request for entry of default or Plaintiffs filing of motion for entry of default judgment by Judge S. James Otero Court Reporter: Not Present. (pj, )
|
Filing
3
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Lourdes G. Baird, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV 97-6967 LGB (SHx)(rn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.