Victor Platas v. A K Scribner
| Victor Platas |
| A K Scribner |
| Culver City Police Department |
| Darren Todd Kavinoky, Mark A McBride and Federal Public Defender |
| 2:2004cv03383 |
| October 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, in favor of A K Scribner against Victor Platas. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. 154 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dfi)
|
|
Filing
49
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: LIMITED WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FOR PURPOSE OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle: For GOOD CAUSE shown, the Court enters the following Protective Order regarding: (1) documents and materials from t rial counsel's files that Petitioner provides to Respondent relevant to claims One and Two pursuant to Bittaker and orders by this Court; (2) any testimony regarding attorney-client matters provided at the evidentiary hearing in this matter; and (3) any reference to such documents or testimony in the parties' pleadings submitted to the Court. (See document for further details.) (pcl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
